On this installment of You Requested, the collection wherein we reply your TV-related questions within the hopes of serving to you and others, we deal with bother with Sonos, whether or not 5,000 nits of brightness is unhealthy for the eyes, and if there’s such a factor as a dumb TV.
Single Sonos encompass?
The primary query comes from @ragoheads, who says: I’m unable to attach my single Period 300 to the Arc and sub. Do we’d like two Period 300s for these to attach?
Based mostly in your description of the scenario, it seems like you are attempting to make use of only one Period 300 as a encompass speaker together with the Sonos Arc and Sonos sub. To the very best of my information, there’s no solution to arrange only one encompass speaker in a Sonos system. The Sonos setup system desires to see two audio system, one for the left channel sign and one for the proper channel sign. I don’t consider the Sonos system has the flexibility to combine a stereo encompass sign all the way down to mono and route it via one speaker. So, sure, if you wish to arrange a encompass system with Period 300 audio system, you’ll most likely want two. I haven’t tried it, however I don’t assume Sonos would help you combine two totally different Sonos speaker fashions, both. So, you most likely couldn’t use, say, a Sonos Period 300 for the proper encompass speaker and a Sonos One for the left speaker.
You should utilize the Period 300 by itself as a music speaker or TV speaker by assigning it to a distinct room. After which you can simply place it behind you within the room the place your Arc and sub are, nevertheless it’s not going to be precise encompass sound, and also you would possibly create extra issues than you resolve, so I wouldn’t suggest it.
How vivid is just too vivid?
@elmousse007 says: How unhealthy would 5,000 nits be for the eyes?
Nicely, it will rely on how a lot display screen space was emitting 5,000 nits. If simply little slivers of the display screen are placing out 5,000 nits as highlights, then it is likely to be intense, nevertheless it’s not going to trigger issues. However the extra display screen space that’s placing out 5,000 nits of brightness, the extra the cumulative impact of that brightness will mount. Additionally, understand that 5,000 nits of vivid white gentle goes to hit totally different than 5,000 nits of purple or inexperienced.
Nvidia Defend upscaling
@jaimedejesus759 writes: If I’m utilizing an Nvidia Defend TV Professional, ought to I fear in regards to the TCL QM8 upscaling?
Admittedly, I’m not precisely positive what you’re asking right here, however I’m going to guess that what you imply is that you simply’re involved the TCL QM8 upscaling isn’t going to be ok on your wants, and also you’re questioning if you happen to can set that concern apart as a result of the Nvidia Defend does upscaling and possibly it’s ok or higher than the QM8.
As common, there isn’t a easy reply to what might be a easy query. The very first thing I have to say is that upscaling and video processing will not be one and the identical. Upscaling is a part of picture processing, however picture processing includes extra than simply upscaling.
I don’t take an enormous situation with the TCL QM8’s decision upscaling — it’s simply taking low-resolution content material and upscaling it to the panel’s native 4K decision. It’s not as sharp as another TVs, that’s true, however it isn’t objectively or subjectively unhealthy. My most important concern was with smoothing out colour gradation on low-bit-depth content material, which isn’t tied to upscaling.
I don’t know what your wants are; I don’t have sufficient data. What’s the decision of the content material you want upscaled? What measurement is the TV you’ll have? Do you actually imply decision upscaling, or is it one thing else?
I are likely to assume that the QM8 might be going to do in addition to, if not higher than, what the Nvidia Defend Professional can do. However, you understand what? I don’t have an
Nvidia Defend Professional
so I can’t say for positive. I’m going to repair that, although. I have to get one in and simply have it on standby, particularly with what I’m seeing occur with sure apps on sure TV manufacturers.
If you may get me extra data, I would have the ability to get you a greater reply. And that sentiment – with extra data, I can present a greater reply – very a lot applies to the following query, and is strictly why I’m bringing this query up this week.
Assist me aid you
@jaimedejesus759 additionally writes: As of in the present day, the LG C3 65-inch is on the identical worth because the TCL QM8 75-inch. Which one ought to I purchase?
This query is an efficient instance of why I can’t give a very useful reply except I’ve extra data. And in addition why it’s laborious for me to provide particular person shopping for recommendation basically.
There’s just about no method for me to do the job of a salesman through textual content or electronic mail with out there being a collection of exchanges whereby I ask a number of qualifying questions. An amazing gross sales affiliate will search to know what your wants and targets are. And that may be a dynamic, conversation-based course of that’s laborious to imitate through text-based communication.
With Jaime, I’m curious to understand how a lot significance he locations on measurement and see how that contrasts with the significance he locations on the standard of the picture — and particularly what he feels makes a high quality picture. What sort of content material does he watch, and what are the sources he makes use of for every kind of content material? The place is the TV going? Does he watch through the day loads? How a lot does he watch at evening? What are the priorities? In particular person, I’d most likely spend 5 to 10 minutes doing that. Through electronic mail or DM or textual content, it may take a number of exchanges that might contain far more time than that.
Individuals receives a commission to be private consumers and consultants, and I perceive why. It takes time, effort, and ability to be good at it. I think about you all notice that, too, which is why you attempt to make the questions easy and simple, in hopes that it received’t take a ton of time and I’m extra prone to reply. However,I don’t wish to provide you with half-assed assist. So, I hope you’ll perceive that I’m not going to have the ability to assist lots of you individually to make a purchase order choice – I’ve to do this at a macro stage. But when you’ll ask, be as detailed as you’ll be able to. You must assist me … aid you. Assist ME, aid you.
Dumb TVs could be good, proper?
Kewitt writes: Is there such a factor as a dumb TV? Wouldn’t it’s higher to bundle a media field like Nvidia Defend versus the event and maintenance of 1 for each TV? I do know my LG TV apps are old-fashioned. My pal’s Philips TV stopped getting updates like 4 years in the past.
And one other alongside the identical strains got here from Alex del Castillo: Why are there no fashionable “dumb” TVs? My dream TV could be one which has 5 or 6 HDMI inputs and a tuner (solely as a result of it has to). With an interface to alter the enter and settings (which would come with unused inputs). This fashion, I can join solely the units I need.
Preach on, guys! You can find no higher ally than me within the advocacy of a dumb TV.
I would favor to have the ability to have a very dumb TV, the place I can get entry to TV settings and inputs, and immediate it for firmware updates if wanted — and that’s it. No apps, no advertisements — only a TV able to show what I inform it to. However I’m afraid that ship has sailed.
There are some sensible causes that TV makers can’t flip again to dumb TVs or make particular editions of TVs with out good TV software program loaded onto them. A few of them are the identical causes we received’t see TVs with out audio system — it’s not possible to make separate SKUs, no less than not at scale with none assure they are going to be in style sufficient to promote and canopy prices. Additionally, as I’ve stated right here earlier than, not doing one thing (on this case, not placing a sensible TV platform in a TV) isn’t essentially as simple because it sounds. You’d assume that simply not doing it will be simpler than doing it. However the primary TV performance — menus, settings, image high quality changes — has been baked into good TV working techniques. Breaking it again out requires {that a} totally different software program run on the TV. So that you’re not simply not doing one thing, you’re forcing your self to make one thing totally different. That prices cash.
Talking of cash — and yeah, I’m afraid cash is commonly on the coronary heart of this stuff — the revenue to be made on these TVs is so low (typically at a loss) that different methods of constructing income have been created to make it possible for making TVs stays worthwhile. These buttons on remotes that take you straight to a streaming app? These are purchased and paid for by the streaming providers. That’s income. Driving viewers to sure items of content material on sure streaming providers? That’s price cash. Promoting merchandise via the TV? That’s price cash. And combination viewer knowledge? That’s price cash, too.
Sure, you should purchase an honest 55-inch 4K TV for $300 now. However there’s a value that comes with that.
To its credit score, Google TV no less than has a “dumb TV” choice that doesn’t precisely make it a dumb TV, however scales again how invasive the good TV platform feels for on a regular basis use. But it surely’s not likely a return to dumb TV.
It’s irritating, I get it. However, frankly, these of us who need dumb TVs are within the minority. Most folk are nice with it or really need it.
Editors’ Suggestions
